No more cluster attempts left
对redis自动生成数据接口进行压测,压测使用ApiPost进行,并发数50,轮次2000。
图片
图片
起初数据执行是正常的,先是出现了redis集群错误
redis.clients.jedis.exceptions.JedisClusterMaxAttemptsException: No more cluster attempts left.
at redis.clients.jedis.JedisClusterCommand.runWithRetries(JedisClusterCommand.java:86) ~[jedis-3.0.1.jar:na]
at redis.clients.jedis.JedisClusterCommand.runWithRetries(JedisClusterCommand.java:124) ~[jedis-3.0.1.jar:na]
at redis.clients.jedis.JedisClusterCommand.runWithRetries(JedisClusterCommand.java:124) ~[jedis-3.0.1.jar:na]
at redis.clients.jedis.JedisClusterCommand.runWithRetries(JedisClusterCommand.java:124) ~[jedis-3.0.1.jar:na]
at redis.clients.jedis.JedisClusterCommand.runWithRetries(JedisClusterCommand.java:124) ~[jedis-3.0.1.jar:na]
at redis.clients.jedis.JedisClusterCommand.runWithRetries(JedisClusterCommand.java:124) ~[jedis-3.0.1.jar:na]
at redis.clients.jedis.JedisClusterCommand.run(JedisClusterCommand.java:25) ~[jedis-3.0.1.jar:na]
at redis.clients.jedis.JedisCluster.exists(JedisCluster.java:142) ~[jedis-3.0.1.jar:na
查看源码报错位置如下
private T runWithRetries(final int slot, int attempts, boolean tryRandomNode, JedisRedirectionException redirect) {
if (attempts <= 0) {
throw new JedisClusterMaxAttemptsException(“No more cluster attempts left.”);
}
attempts小于等于0时报错,根据日志向上追踪至124行
// release current connection before recursion
releaseConnection(connection);
connection = null;
if (attempts <= 1) {
//We need this because if node is not reachable anymore - we need to finally initiate slots
//renewing, or we can stuck with cluster state without one node in opposite case.
//But now if maxAttempts = [1 or 2] we will do it too often.
//TODO make tracking of successful/unsuccessful operations for node - do renewing only
//if there were no successful responses from this node last few seconds
this.connectionHandler.renewSlotCache();
}
//124行
return runWithRetries(slot, attempts - 1, tryRandomNode, redirect);
入参之前对attempts 进行-1,也就是说attempts 想要小于等于0,attempts 入参就是小于等于1,根据注释来说当尝试次数是1-2之间时,将会对不成功响应的节点进行初始化。根据压测数量来看,最多数据为2000*50即10万条,排除数据量过大或者版本问题,开发环境redis为集群模式。
最终也没有得到合适的解决方案,当然在压测过程中除了偶发失败之外,用户是无感知的,节点失败重试即可。
getOutputStream() has already been called for this response
response.getOutputStream() 已经用过了不能再次使用。
java.lang.IllegalStateException: getOutputStream() has already been called for this response
at org.apache.catalina.connector.Response.getWriter(Response.java:582) ~[tomcat-embed-core-9.0.14.jar:9.0.14]
at org.apache.catalina.connector.ResponseFacade.getWriter(ResponseFacade.java:227) ~[tomcat-embed-core-9.0.14.jar:9.0.14]
在get请求中,对于token验证和跨域处理,通过实现Filter接口实现,报错位置如下
private void handleException(ServletResponse response, CommonResponse commonResponse) throws IOException {
response.setContentType(“application/json;charset=UTF-8”);
PrintWriter writer = response.getWriter();//此行
writer.write(JSONUtil.tJSON(commonResponse));
writer.flush();
writer.close();
}
图片
图片
针对filter的代码非源码部分,stackoverflow针对此问题有解答
图片
建议执行flush方法后执行close方法,可见在代码中是没有区别的。
知识点
SpringMVC中所有Controller接口进行返回时底层都是用response.getOutputStream() 或 response.getWriter()进行输出的;Tomcat的ServletRequest中, getParameter()方法与getInputStream()/getReader()不兼容, 只能选择一方.调用了一方, 另一方就会是空的(前提:表单的POST请求).
private void handleException(ServletResponse response, CommonResponse commonResponse) throws IOException {
response.setContentType(“application/json;charset=UTF-8”);
response.reset();
PrintWriter writer = response.getWriter();
writer.write(JSONUtil.tJSON(commonResponse));
writer.flush();
writer.close();
}
但是仍没有解决,依旧报错。在HttpServletRequestWrapper中重写getreader和getInputStream方法。
图片这个jodd的StreamUtil真是难找
图片
public class ParameterRequestWrapper extends HttpServletRequestWrapper {
private Map<String,Object> params;
private byte[] body;
public ParameterRequestWrapper(HttpServletRequest request, Map<String,Object> newParams) throws IOException {
super(request);
this.params = newParams;
body = StreamUtil.readBytes(request.getReader(), “UTF-8”);
}
@Override
public BufferedReader getReader() throws IOException {
return new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(getInputStream()));
}
@SuppressWarnings(“unchecked”)
public Map getParameterMap() {
return params;
}
@SuppressWarnings(“unchecked”)
public Enumeration getParameterNames() {
Vector l = new Vector(params.keySet());
return l.elements();
}
public String[] getParameterValues(String name) {
Object v = params.get(name);
if (v == null) {
return null;
} else if (v instanceof String[]) {
return (String[]) v;
} else if (v instanceof String) {
return new String[] { (String) v };
} else {
return new String[] { v.toString() };
}
}
public String getParameter(String name) {
Object v = params.get(name);
if (v == null) {
return null;
} else if (v instanceof String[]) {
String[] strArr = (String[]) v;
if (strArr.length > 0) {
return strArr[0];
} else {
return null;
}
} else if (v instanceof String) {
return (String) v;
} else {
return v.toString();
}
}
@Override
public ServletInputStream getInputStream() throws IOException {
final ByteArrayInputStream bais = new ByteArrayInputStream(body);
return new ServletInputStream() {
@Override
public boolean isFinished() {
return bais.available() == 0;
}
@Override
public boolean isReady() {
return true;
}
@Override
public void setReadListener(ReadListener readListener) {
}
@Override
public int read() throws IOException {
return bais.read();
}
};
}
}
仍旧报错图片
在本filter执行dofilterchain之前应将request转为HttpServletRequest然后再进行wrapper初始化。
更改代码如下
HttpServletRequest req = (HttpServletRequest) request;
Map<String,Object> map=new HashMap(request.getParameterMap());
String[] keySet = map.keySet().toArray(new String[0]);
for(String key : keySet){
Object value = map.get(key);
if (value instanceof String[]) {
String[] valueArray = (String[]) value;
for (int i = 0; i < valueArray.length; i++) {
if(org.apache.commons.lang.StringUtils.isNotEmpty(valueArray[i]) && !"null".equals(valueArray[i])){
valueArray[i] = valueArray[i].trim();
}else{
map.remove(key);
}
}
}else{
if(value==null){
map.remove(key);
}
}
}
ParameterRequestWrapper wrapRequest=new ParameterRequestWrapper(req,map);
chain.doFilter(wrapRequest, response);
报错仍旧产生,但细心又发现在我这个filter之前还有一个上游组件的filter已经执行了dofilter,但是在上游的dofilter并未执行response的getwriter方法。
在报错的源码中最终定位到org.apache.catalina.connector.Response#getWriter方法,可以看到在if判断中应该是为了保证调用的resposne写方法一致,要不都用getWriter(),要不都用getOutputStream()。而我并没有使用getOutputStream(),那就只能说SpringBoot中底层代码用的getOutputStream。
@Override
public PrintWriter getWriter()
throws IOException {
if (usingOutputStream) {
throw new IllegalStateException
(sm.getString("coyoteResponse.getWriter.ise"));
}
if (ENFORCE_ENCODING_IN_GET_WRITER) {
/*
* If the response's character encoding has not been specified as
* described in <code>getCharacterEncoding</code> (i.e., the method
* just returns the default value <code>ISO-8859-1</code>),
* <code>getWriter</code> updates it to <code>ISO-8859-1</code>
* (with the effect that a subsequent call to getContentType() will
* include a charset=ISO-8859-1 component which will also be
* reflected in the Content-Type response header, thereby satisfying
* the Servlet spec requirement that containers must communicate the
* character encoding used for the servlet response's writer to the
* client).
*/
setCharacterEncoding(getCharacterEncoding());
}
usingWriter = true;
outputBuffer.checkConverter();
if (writer == null) {
writer = new CoyoteWriter(outputBuffer);
}
return writer;
}
遂改造如下
ServletOutputStream outputStream = response.getOutputStream();
outputStream.flush();
outputStream.close();
,尽管如此,我仍觉得流的关闭节点有问题,但我又没什么证据。第一个报错用户虽无法感知,但面临丢数据和偶发报错的情况,如有好的解决方案会及时更新。
强烈推荐参考博文
https://www.cnblogs.com/bencakes/p/14433332.html
https://blog.csdn.net/u012977486/article/details/88821887
https://blog.csdn.net/TimerBin/article/details/90295451
- 点赞
- 收藏
- 关注作者
评论(0)